Two Truths of Trump’s Second Term
This is an version of The Atlantic Daily, a publication that guides you thru the most important tales of the day, helps you uncover new concepts, and recommends the perfect in tradition. Sign up for it here.
Over the primary two weeks of the second Donald Trump presidency, the narrative has swung forwards and backwards abruptly. A flurry of govt orders to start out the time period: proof of a newly disciplined, regimented administration. The fast retreat from a federal funding freeze: proof of the identical chaos that dogged Trump’s first stint as president. Elon Musk’s blitzkrieg in opposition to USAID: Who may even be certain?
The first Trump administration conditioned many individuals to low cost the seriousness of any effort. No matter what Trump promised, he was too mercurial a president and ineffective a supervisor to make it occur. He actually did wish to repeal Obamacare and construct a border wall, however he simply didn’t have the eye span to execute, and his workers was too consumed with internecine feuds to be helpful. The outcome was perpetual dysfunction and underachievement.
More not too long ago, Trumpworld has cultivated an impression of higher management. Trump’s 2024 marketing campaign co-manager Susie Wiles was credited with holding him on monitor through the lead-up to the election (with some notable exceptions), and he or she’s now White House chief of workers. Project 2025, an out of doors effort led by previous, present, and certain future White House staffers, additionally demonstrates cautious thought of learn how to higher execute throughout a second time period. When Trump signed a collection of govt orders alongside many fronts on January 20 and 21, it appeared to show that one thing had modified, though sharp rebukes from federal judges and sloppy drafting errors have raised doubts since then.
But chaos versus technique is a deceptive and unhelpful binary for understanding this presidency. Chaos definitely helps Trump, as a result of it makes coordinated resistance from Congress, exterior advocates, or the public difficult. Many White House actions look like usurping legislative authority, however the velocity of the strikes has left members of Congress in each events wanting shocked and indecisive. His objective, nonetheless, shouldn’t be merely to create confusion. Trump likes holding his aides siloed—it permits him to play them off each other, and prevents anyone faction from getting too sturdy. (His appreciation for checks and balances doesn’t seem to increase to Congress and the courts.) Internal feuding isn’t a draw back for Trump: It’s his method of settling disputes.
Moreover, the chaos doesn’t evince a scarcity of technique. As I wrote last week, the grant freeze by the Office of Management and Budget wasn’t some advert hoc transfer, however as an alternative a part of a long-running plan by conservative ideologues to problem the legislation that forestalls the president from withholding cash that’s appropriated. That’s additionally why the White House’s retreat from the freeze is sort of definitely solely short-term.
Elon Musk’s strikes, via the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, look like extra improvisational. Unlike the OMB wonks, Musk has little data of how the federal authorities works and little curiosity within the danger of his actions; his staff reportedly includes inexperienced aides as younger as 19. Nonetheless, the transformation of Twitter into X serves as a superb mannequin for a way this would possibly play out. After Musk’s aggressive takeover, refugees from the corporate made dire warnings about it collapsing totally. More than two years later, the location is overrun with racist trolls, however it’s nonetheless practical and has develop into a robust political weapon for Musk.
If Musk is left to his personal units, we’d anticipate one thing comparable from DOGE. He’s already gotten practically 1 % of the federal workforce to resign, virtually single-handledly introduced USAID to the verge of demise, and reportedly acquired entry to reams of presidency information. As my colleague Charlie Warzel wrote yesterday, “It is nothing short of an administrative coup.” A Muskified federal authorities may not serve the general public very properly, however it may develop into an efficient political instrument for Musk and his allies.
And which may not be the one administrative coup in motion. New staffers are becoming a member of the administration daily, and lots of of them have ties to Project 2025, the scheme to overtake the federal authorities. Russell Vought, the mental main mild of Project 2025, passed a procedural vote yesterday and might be confirmed to steer OMB this week. Adam Candeub, one other Project 2025 contributor, was simply named basic counsel of the Federal Communications Commission. This group is way extra methodical than Musk, preferring a cautious and quiet plan to his blunt, noisy tack.
What unites Musk and the ideologues is a dedication to do no matter they will, and see what they will get away with it. If that appears like chaos, so be it. They know what it’s they’re making an attempt to do.
Related:
Here are 4 new tales from The Atlantic:
- The “rapid unscheduled disassembly” of the United States government
- The constitutional crisis is here.
- Elon Musk is president, Jonathan Lemire writes.
- The last days of American orange juice
Today’s News
- China announced retaliatory tariffs on U.S. gasoline, coal, and different merchandise, which can go into impact subsequent Monday. Chinese regulators additionally started an anti-monopoly investigation into Google.
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard handed key committee votes to advance their Cabinet nominations to the Senate ground.
- Several FBI workers sued the Justice Department over its order for the bureau to show over an inventory of names of workers who labored on investigations associated to the January 6 revolt.
Evening Read

What’s Up With All the Sex Parties?
By Xochitl Gonzalez
In the course of my analysis, I didn’t—I want to be clear right here—take part in any intercourse events. I believe it’s sensible to not get that near your sources. I realized that “play parties” can happen in folks’s houses, however many occur beneath the auspices of personal golf equipment. I reached out to numerous distinguished ones, questioning if the sex-club growth was actual, and what really goes on at them. One of my main findings: People, particularly wealthy folks, give you extraordinarily elaborate justifications for getting laid.
More From The Atlantic
- Democracy in Eastern Europe faces another crisis.
- DeepSeek and the truth about Chinese tech
- American history is key to understanding Trump.
- “Dear James”: My friend’s Instagram account has taken a dark turn.
Culture Break

Debate. When folks say they “don’t like” kids, they’re expressing far more than a choice, Stephanie H. Murray writes.
Read. The novelist Ali Smith scrambles plotlines, upends characters, and flouts chronology—whereas telling propulsively readable tales, Adam Begley writes.
P.S.

I forgot one different factor I share with Tom: a love of cats. This is my irascible assistant and ombudscat, Mackerel (a.okay.a. Mack, Mackintosh, Mackinac … or no matter my youngsters give you at any given second). He’s virtually a yr previous, and when he’s not hiding in a laundry hamper, harassing his massive sister Nellie, or stealing meals off the counter, he’s often getting in my face or strolling throughout my keyboard—so please direct any typo complaints his method.
— David
Stephanie Bai contributed to this text.
Explore all of our newsletters here.
When you purchase a ebook utilizing a hyperlink on this publication, we obtain a fee. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.